Connect with us

Technology

Republican Congress Member Threatened Demonstrators In A Post

Published

on

Facebook removed two posts from a Republican member of Congress representing Louisiana on Tuesday in which he threatened demonstrators against police violence, suggesting he would shoot and “drop any 10 of you where you stand” if they took to the street armed.

“If this shows up, we’ll consider the armed presence a real threat,” Rep. Clay Higgins, a former law enforcement officer, posted Tuesday on his personal, verified Captain Clay Higgins Facebook page along with a picture of an armed Black militia group that has protested the police killings of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd. “We don’t care what color you are. We don’t care if you’re left or right. If you show up like this, if We recognize threat… you won’t walk away.”

Higgins, a vocal advocate for gun rights who was elected to Congress in 2016 and who has been featured in NRA promotional videos, made no reference to protesters turning violent, but instead suggested their mere armed presence would be considered a threat.

“I wouldn’t even spill my beer. … We are SWAT. Nothing personal. We just eliminate the threat. … That’s not a challenge, fellas. It’s a promise,” he wrote Tuesday.

Louisiana is an open-carry state, meaning a permit is not required for someone to visibly carry a firearm in public.

Higgins has also touted himself as a strong advocate for the Second Amendment. One of his political ads started with him wearing a SWAT vest, shooting a rifle, and telling the viewer to “tell the world we’re American.”

“You’re the ones threatening, if you show yourselves, aggressively natured and armed in my presence,” he wrote in his now-deleted post. “We don’t want to see your worthless ass nor do we want to make your Mothers cry.”

Higgins did not explicitly threaten to shoot protesters, but seemed to make reference to it in his post by writing “1,450 fps” – a reference to the speed of some ammo measured by feet per second.

A spokesperson for Facebook told BuzzFeed News Tuesday night that the lawmaker’s post had been removed for breaking its violence and incitement policies, which state that content is removed if it “incites or facilitates serious violence.”

Higgins’ post had featured a picture of masked protesters raising a fist in the air and who did not appear to be visibly armed, as well as a second picture of a Black militia group called the Not Fucking Around Coalition, or NFAC. Its members have appeared heavily armed in bulletproof vests at protests against police brutality, including the killing of Taylor in Louisville. The group has challenged white supremacist groups, including the KKK, into confrontations and has called for the removal of Confederate monuments.

The lawmaker’s post was made after a rumor began circling on social media that members of the NFAC would be appearing in Lafayette, Louisiana. The group did not ultimately appear.

However, both KATC and the Advocate reported that at Tuesday night’s Black Lives Matter protest at Layfayette City Hall, it was actually a right-wing militia who showed up “heavily armed.” The Advocate reported that 40 to 50 members of the Louisiana Cajun Militia attended the demonstration. The group posted pictures of its members in bulletproof vests and camouflage gear and armed with long guns outside the government building.

Higgins has made no mention of that armed group in his social media accounts and his office did not respond to multiple requests for comment about his posts or the militia’s presence at Tuesday’s protest. But the lawmaker has shown no qualms in the past about appearing alongside and speaking at events organized by other mostly white militia groups.

On July 29, 2017, Higgins appeared at a DC event organized by Oath Keepers, a group that claims to have tens of thousands of members and has been described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a radical anti-government group.

Although leaders of the group contend it is not a militia, the group has acted and launched “operations” similar to a paramilitary force. Members of other militia groups were invited and attended the event.

The Advocate has also reported the Louisiana Republican has sold shirts at his political events with logos identical to that of the Three Percenters, another set of anti-government militia groups scattered across the country.

After his original post was taken down Tuesday night, Higgins followed up on Facebook saying he had not deleted the post himself, suggested he was being censored, and continued to encourage people to respond to protesters. “America is being manipulated into a new era of government control. Your liberty is threatened from within. Welcome to the front lines, Ladies and Gentlemen. … I’ll advise when it’s time gear up, mount up, and roll out,” he wrote.

That post was removed on Wednesday evening after BuzzFeed News asked whether it also went against the platform’s policies. The Facebook spokesperson said the second post also violated “our policies against inciting violence.”

Rob Anderson, a Democrat running against Higgins in 2020, said in a statement that his campaign informed local, state, and federal law enforcement about Higgins’ posts and also contacted Republican and Democratic leadership in Congress.

“No elected official in this nation in any office should be responsible for drumming up violence where there is no violence,” Anderson said. “To do so is literally to break the oath he took to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution. … What Congressman Higgins has done with his words inciting violence is to rally those who believe his words to arm themselves, and come into our district looking for war. This is absolutely the most reckless, negligent, and irresponsible thing a public official could do. If he had a shred of dignity, he would resign.”

Representatives for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy did not respond for requests for comment on Higgins’ posts.

The posts come, and were removed, as protests continue across the country against the killing of Black people by police, and as these demonstrations are increasingly met by opposing, sometimes armed counterprotesters with deadly results.

In Kenosha, a 17-year-old was charged with shooting and killing two people during a protest against the shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man shot seven times in the back by a white police officer. In Portland, Oregon, a man who appeared to be with a right-wing group was killed this weekend.

Higgins is a former law enforcement officer and was a member of a SWAT team. He resigned from the Opelousas Police Department in 2007 after an internal investigation accused him of using unnecessary force on a suspect (he has since denied that was the reason for his resignation).

Higgins later went viral for a series of “tough on crime” videos he made during his time at the St. Landry Parish Sheriff’s office for its Crime Stoppers program. In the videos, Higgins often addressed people accused of crimes directly, mocking them and asking them to turn themselves in, or threatened to take them down himself, referring to members of a gang in one video as “animals” and “thugs,” for example. He earned himself the nickname “Cajun John Wayne” for his delivery and he resigned in 2016 after the St. Landry Sheriff and the ACLU criticized his videos.

Just a few months after he resigned, Higgins announced a campaign for Congress and won. Just six months into his first term, Higgins posted a video from inside a gas chamber at Auschwitz, saying that the US needs to be prepared because it is now “more accessible to terror like this, horror like this.” Higgins took down the video after the Auschwitz Memorial Museum criticized it and said that the gas chambers are not a “stage.”

UPDATE

This story was updated with a statement from Rob Anderson’s campaign.

UPDATE

This post was updated after Facebook removed Higgins’ second post.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Technology

Zuckerberg Says Facebook Will Ban Less Content Post-Election

Published

on

By


Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Facebook has spent the past few months scrambling to ban Holocaust denial, the QAnon mass delusion, and right-wing extremist groups. To outside observers, it appears the company is finally reckoning with the vast landscape of hate and disinformation it has helped create.

But Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently told employees at a companywide meeting the real reason the social network was cracking down: the US presidential election.

In an all-hands conference call with Facebook employees last Thursday, the 36-year-old billionaire said that the company made policy changes to address the unstable situation around the US election and its aftermath. There has been no change in the way the company operates, according to Zuckerberg, who maintains majority shareholder voting power at Facebook.

“Once we’re past these events, and we’ve resolved them peacefully, I wouldn’t expect that we continue to adopt a lot more policies that are restricting of a lot more content,” Zuckerberg said in audio of the conference call obtained by BuzzFeed News.

While observers have speculated that Facebook’s new policies against potentially violent and conspiratorial content could mean that it’s turned a corner — or that the company is preparing for a Biden presidency and possible government regulation — Zuckerberg’s comments are an indication that the new rules are only stopgap measures. The 3 billion people who use at least one Facebook-owned product should not expect more rule changes after the election, Zuckerberg said.

“The basic answer is that this does not reflect a shift in our underlying philosophy or strong support of free expression,” he said. “What it reflects is, in our view, an increased risk of violence and unrest, especially around the elections, and an increased risk of physical harm, especially around the time when we expect COVID vaccines to be approved over the coming months.”

“This does not reflect a shift in our underlying philosophy or strong support of free expression.”

While the social network has created new policies to address health misinformation, violence-inciting militants, and hate, Zuckerberg has not expressed the same kind of candor in public Facebook posts as he has in speeches to his own employees. In September, he provided a general update on the company’s approach to the US election, which was followed this month by a post explaining the changing approach to Holocaust denial content.

He had previously posted a video in August explaining the “operational mistake” of allowing a militant group to exist on the platform in the lead-up to the shooting deaths of two protesters in Kenosha, Wisconsin. But he only published the video, which was made at an August all-hands meeting, after BuzzFeed News reported the contents of his talk and his admission to the company’s failure to act.

On Thursday, he tried to provide more clarity to more than 50,000 workers, some of whom pressed him on why it took so long take action against Holocaust denial. In 2018, Zuckerberg famously said in an interview that while he abhors such rhetoric, Facebook allowed Holocaust denial content because it showed that the company stood for free expression.

“There are a lot of things that I think that people say that are deeply offensive, and that are hurtful or even hateful,” Zuckerberg said. “But you know, where I think that we should draw the line is around when something has the likelihood to contribute to real-world violence or harm. And what we’ve seen over the last several years is a rise in anti-Semitic violence, both in the United States and across the world.”

“There’s an increased risk of these kind of different attacks, especially around this flashpoint around the election,” he added.

Facebook spokesperson Liz Bourgeois reiterated the idea that the changes in polices did not reflect a new approach to the company’s principles.

“We remain committed to free expression while also recognizing the current environment requires clearer guardrails to minimize harm,” she said.

For some, Zuckerberg’s comments may reinforce the charge that the company only makes policy changes when faced with major US events or under press scrutiny. In an explosive internal memo posted last month, fired engineer Sophie Zhang wrote that the company prioritized action in instances of political or electoral misinformation in the US and Western Europe.

“It’s an open secret within the civic integrity space that Facebook’s short-term decisions are largely motivated by PR and the potential for negative attention,” she wrote in her note, which was first obtained by BuzzFeed News.

In his talk, Zuckerberg cited non-US and European countries where the company had supposedly taken action to ban certain types of speech to prevent real-world harm.

“We’ve had ongoing work in a number of countries that we consider at risk — countries at risk of ongoing civil conflict, places like Myanmar, or Sri Lanka, or Ethiopia — where the determination that we’ve made alongside human rights groups and local groups on the ground is that a wider band of speech and expression would lead potentially to more incitement of violence or different issues,” he said.

In 2018, United Nations investigators found that Facebook had been culpable and slow to act against hate speech that fueled the genocide of Rohingya Muslims, an ethnic minority that had lived primarily in Myanmar’s Rakhine state. Facebook was also used to organize deadly violence against Muslims in Sri Lanka. Violent rhetoric on the social network is also pushing Ethiopia closer to genocide, according to Vice.

“The idea that this election is the only one that matters is nuts,” said David Kaye, a former UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression and clinical professor of law at the University of California, Irvine. “The platform has an enormous and a more significant impact in a lot of places around the world.”

“To say we’re done does not strike me as a plausible response to the possible violence that could be done in the next couple of months or years,” he added.

“To say we’re done does not strike me as a plausible response to the possible violence that could be done in the next couple of months or years.”

In his remarks about the election, Zuckerberg mostly avoided discussion of the company’s decision to limit the spread of an unconfirmed New York Post story about Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden, only suggesting that it could have been part of “a big misinformation dump.”

He did, however, comment on the current presidential polling, which favors Biden.

“It looks like potentially Biden’s margin of leading in the polls has increased, which may lead to a result, which is not close, which, could be potentially helpful — if there’s just a decisive victory from someone — that could be helpful for clarity and for not having violence or civil unrest after the election,” Zuckerberg said. Facebook is currently running an online voting information center to tell people that results may not be settled by the end of election night due to the large increase in mail-in voting during the pandemic.

Beyond the election, Zuckerberg addressed other employee concerns, including when they’d be asked to return to the office. While some Facebook content moderator contractors have been required to come back to offices in California and Texas, Facebook’s CEO said it was not a priority for full-time workers and that remote work “was the only responsible thing to do during a pandemic.”

On Monday, the Intercept reported that a Facebook contractor hired by Accenture who had returned to an office in Austin had contracted the novel coronavirus. That person is now in self-quarantine.

When prompted, Zuckerberg also discussed his views on a recent report from a House of Representatives subcommittee on antitrust issues. After noting that he thought Facebook existed in a competitive environment that included Twitter, Snapchat, and TikTok, he said that his company would be adopting a policy that prevented employees from discussing antitrust issues on internal forums and messages.

He called a policy at Google that prohibits employees from discussing antitrust issues because of ongoing federal investigations “quite prudent” and noted that Facebook would be taking the same approach.

“Given that, you know, anything that any of you say internally is, of course, available to be subpoenaed or used in any of these investigations, I just think we should make sure that people aren’t just, you know, mouthing off about this and saying things that may reflect inaccurate data, or generally just are kind of incomplete,” he said, minutes after noting how Facebook stood for free expression. “You shouldn’t be emailing about these things and you shouldn’t really be discussing this in non-privileged forums across the company.”


Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

DOJ Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Google Monopoly

Published

on

By

The Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit against tech giant Google on Tuesday, arguing the company unlawfully maintains its monopoly over internet search dollars through anticompetitive practices.

For over a year, the DOJ has investigated Google, a company with a market value of $1 trillion and control of over 80% of internet searches in the country.

In a phone call with reporters, Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen called Google the “gateway to the internet” and accused it of “exclusionary practices that are harmful to competition.”

The lawsuit was filed jointly with 11 state attorneys general in federal court in Washington, DC.

“Two decades ago, Google became the darling of Silicon Valley as a scrappy
startup with an innovative way to search the emerging internet,” reads the complaint. “That Google is long gone.”

The lawsuit argues that by making itself the preset search engine on Android phones and paying billions to other companies — such as Apple, LG, and Motorola — to ensure it is the default search engine on their products, Google has cut off other competitors from ever having a chance to take a foothold in the market.

“Google no longer competes only on the merits but instead uses its monopoly power – and billions in monopoly profits – to lock up key pathways to search on mobile phones, browsers, and next generation devices, depriving rivals of distribution and scale,” Attorney General Bill Barr said in a statement. “The end result is that no one can feasibly challenge Google’s dominance in search and search advertising.”

The European Union has filed repeated antitrust lawsuits against Google since 2010.

In recent years, Google has accounted for 95% of all search queries on mobile devices. The DOJ argues that this stifles innovation and customer choice, but Google says it’s the customers who are choosing.

“Today’s lawsuit by the Department of Justice is deeply flawed,” said a Google spokesperson. “People use Google because they choose to — not because they’re forced to or because they can’t find alternatives.”

Google has published an extensive response to the DOJ lawsuit, arguing that it is not pre-loaded on many devices and that it plans to fight the case.

“This lawsuit would do nothing to help consumers,” it reads. “To the contrary, it would artificially prop up lower-quality search alternatives, raise phone prices, and make it harder for people to get the search services they want to use.”

For months, Barr has publicly spoken about his Google investigation. Rosen announced that Barr chose to focus on Google and other tech companies after “broad bipartisan concerns” were raising during his Senate confirmation hearings about the concentration of tech companies and their power.

President Donald Trump also baselessly accused Google last year of interfering in the 2016 election, tweeting “watch out Google” and “Google should be sued.”

But it’s not just the Trump administration who has been pushing for this. Sen. Elizabeth Warren has led progressive politicians in speaking out about the monopoly of tech companies.

“Two things can be true at the same time: Bill Barr is a corrupt Trump crony who should not be the Attorney General and the Justice Department has the power to pursue a legitimate, long-time coming suit against Google for engaging in anti-competitive, manipulative, and often illegal conduct,” wrote Warren in a Facebook post Monday. “The case against Google is clear and it must move forward without any political interference from AG Barr or Big Tech’s army of lobbyists.”

Accusing social media and tech companies of “bias” or supposed political censorship has been a constant claim of the right, including the president, whose own posts have been repeatedly flagged by Twitter and Facebook for spreading disinformation.

“This case has nothing to do with that subject,” said Rosen. “The antitrust case is very separate from the questions about social media and some other technology issues that are out there about skew or bias.”

The DOJ’s announcement comes just two weeks before the presidential election. But Rosen rejected the suggestion that the lawsuit was rushed out before the election.

“If anything, this is a situation where we might have preferred to be quicker but we wanted to make sure we’ve done the work that’s necessary,” said Rosen.

The last major antitrust lawsuit into a tech monopoly by the DOJ was Microsoft in 1998, the same year Google was founded.

“We could lose the next wave of innovation,” said Rosen, “If that happens, Americans may not get to see the next Google.”


Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Qualcomm introduces Radio Access Network chips for 5G infrastructure

Published

on

By

Cristiano Amon, president of Qualcomm and Qualcomm CDMA Technologies, responds to a question during a panel discussion on 5G wireless broadband technology during the 2018 CES in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S. January 10, 2018.

Steve Marcus | Reuters

Qualcomm on Tuesday announced new chips and software products that the company hopes will give wireless carriers access to cheaper hardware for building out 5G networks than current base stations from companies like Ericsson and Huawei.

Qualcomm stock is up over 43% this year as investors bet that its mobile chips, like the modem in Apple‘s latest iPhones or the processor in Samsung Galaxy phones, stand to benefit from a wave of spending on 5G.

But Qualcomm’s new Radio Access Network chips go on the other side of a 5G connection — instead of being inside a handset, they’re designed to go into the base stations, packed with antennas and chips, that carriers place around cities to deliver internet over cellular connections. The RAN products are Qualcomm’s shot to get a piece of the 5G network infrastructure market, which will be worth over $8 billion this year, according to a Gartner estimate.

Qualcomm won’t actually make any base stations or infrastructure, unlike companies such as Huawei, Ericcsson, or Nokia. Instead, Qualcomm will sell its customers baseband, processing and RF chips combined with software that allow them to build “virtualized radio access” networks in which base station components are built according to specifications that allows them to work together. This could allow carriers to avoid lock-in to a single provider and choose components of a base station on a part-by-part basis. For example, a carrier could buy radios from one provider and processors from Qualcomm.

Qualcomm’s RAN products support several bands of 5G, including the speedy millimeter wave connections that require more base stations and have a fairly short range, and the slower sub-6 millimeter flavor that can be broadcast over wide regions.

“5G enables a very large expansion of the Qualcomm addressable market, because 5G is going everywhere. It’s going to automotive, it’s going everywhere. The networking aspects of 5G comes with that transition,” Qualcomm President Cristiano Amon said. “It’s a very small incremental investment and it creates an expansion of the Qualcomm addressable market.”

Amon declined to identify companies planning to use Qualcomm’s RAN product but said the likely customers include existing base-station makers as well as new companies that want to create cellular infrastructure, such as carriers that could end up building their own base stations. Qualcomm’s customers will get engineering samples in 2022.

Open standards

Qualcomm has a history of selling chips for infrastructure back in the ’90s, and it started selling RAN products in 2018, but so far it has focused on “small cells,” or tiny base stations for small numbers of users. Its new products can support “macro” base stations for public networks operated by carriers that have millions of subscribers, Amon said.

Qualcomm’s products are compatible with O-RAN, a standard backed by Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile. Open standard base stations are expected to generate $5 billion in sales per year over the next five years, according to Dell’Oro Group, an industry researcher. Other companies including Intel, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell, and Cisco are also offering base station parts that are compatible with O-RAN, Bloomberg reported last month.

Amon compares the rise of virtualized cellular networks to the growth of cloud computing over the past decade where companies realized that instead of buying and maintaining servers, they could purchase computer processing as a commodity, separating the expensive server hardware from the software.

“The telecom networks have been end-to-end systems. Now with 5G, there is one thing happening parallel which is the transition of networks to full virtualization,” Amon said. “The networks get virtualized, so the radio access networks run on general purpose computers.”

The announcement also marks an American company making substantial investments in the world of cellular infrastructure, which has become a hot international topic as countries like the United States and Australia have eliminated China’s Huawei gear from 5G networks because of what officials say are national security reasons.

White House economic advisor Larry Kudlow said in an interview in February that the U.S. wants to have 5G infrastructure “done by American firms.” Officials in Congress have also introduced legislation that would fund O-RAN technology development.


Source link

Continue Reading

Breaking News

Shares